Korean American Hospitals in LA Refuse PPO Patients Over Billing Hurdles

Some Korean American hospitals in the Los Angeles area are refusing to treat patients with PPO (Preferred Provider Organization) health insurance plans, drawing criticism for prioritizing revenue stability over broader patient access.

Doctor in medical gown standing with arms crossed, representing Korean American hospitals and PPO patient access issues
Doctor stands in clinic hallway as Korean American hospitals face criticism over refusing PPO patients

These hospitals reportedly prefer HMO (Health Maintenance Organization) plans, which guarantee steady income through monthly per-patient payments. In contrast, PPO patients require individual claims to be submitted to insurance companies, a process many providers find burdensome.

A Korean American patient, Lee, shared that she was recently denied service while awaiting results from an eye exam. โ€œI was told not to come back because the clinic no longer accepts PPO plans,โ€ she said.

Facilities that focus on treating Medicare and Medi-Cal patients aged 65 and older are especially likely to avoid PPO plans. HMO patients in this age group often represent reliable income for clinics.

An insurance company representative, speaking anonymously, said, โ€œIn Southern California, HMO has become the dominant plan. Clinics receive fixed monthly payments based on patient count, while PPO patients require a separate billing process for each visit.โ€

Under the HMO system, patients must obtain a referral from a primary care physician before seeing a specialist, effectively placing decision-making authority in the hands of the primary provider. PPO plans offer patients the flexibility to see specialists directly. Despite this advantage, many PPO subscribers report being unable to use their benefits due to provider refusal.

A staff member at P Clinic, a Koreatown internal medicine clinic, said, โ€œWe accept both HMO and PPO patients, but some other clinics avoid PPO because the reimbursement process with insurers often leads to billing complications.โ€

This type of selective patient intake can result in dangerous situations.

A patient named Park recently experienced severe abdominal pain but was turned away by a Koreatown internal medicine clinic, referred to here as K Clinic, because it did not accept PPO plans. โ€œEven though I should be able to go anywhere with a PPO, I now have to call ahead to see if Iโ€™ll be accepted,โ€ he said. โ€œSome places wonโ€™t even take HMO patients unless theyโ€™re seniors.โ€

K Clinic stated, โ€œWeโ€™re currently only accepting new Medicare or Medi-Cal HMO patients aged 65 and older because we already have too many patients.โ€

Internal medicine doctor Lee noted, โ€œThereโ€™s no real difficulty in handling PPO billing from the hospitalโ€™s perspective. But since operations are financially stable with just HMO patients, many clinics donโ€™t feel the need to accept PPO.โ€

However, not all clinics share this view.

A representative from Lee Sungwon Internal Medicine said, โ€œI donโ€™t understand why PPO patients are being rejected. They actually have more freedom to choose, which should benefit hospitals.โ€

Jung Joon Internal Medicine confirmed, โ€œWe donโ€™t differentiate between HMO and PPOโ€”our clinic accepts all patients.โ€

Some observers attribute this trend, in part, to the aging of Korean American physicians. As they reduce their clinic hours, some prefer to limit treatment to patients whose insurance is easier to process or more profitable.

BY HYOUNGJAE KIM [kim.ian@koreadaily.com]